- 
- 
Introduction
 - 
Coarse graining Alice and Dinah
 - 
Coarse graining part I - Clustering algorithms
 - 
Coarse graining part II - Entropy
 
- 
- 
- 
Markov Chains
 - 
Mathematics of coarse grained Markov chains
 - 
Mathematics of Coarse grained Markov Chains: The General Case
 - 
A puzzle: origin of the slippy counter
 - 
Where we are so far
 
- 
- 
- 
Cellular Automata: Introduction
 - 
Israeli and Goldenfeld; projection and commuting diagrams
 - 
Networks of Renormalization
 
- 
- 
- 
Fixing a projection: From CA’s to Ising
 - 
Introduction to the Ising Model
 - 
Coarse-graining the Lattice
 - 
Inducing Quartets & Commutation Failure
 - 
Finding Fixed Points
 - 
Ising Model Simulations
 
- 
- 
- 
Poking the Creature: An Introduction to Group Theory
 - 
Irreversible Computations, Forgetful Computers and the Krohn-Rhodes Theorem
 
- 
- 
- 
From Quantum Electrodynamics to Plasma Physics
 - 
The Thermal Physics of Plasma
 - 
How does a particle move the plasma?
 - 
Charge Renormalization and Feedback
 
- 
- 
- 
Conclusion: Keeping the things that matter
 
- 
- 
6.4 Charge Renormalization and Feedback » Quiz Solution
What is a "non-renormalizable" theory? (As we use the term here.)
A. a theory where when you coarse-grain, you get new terms that can't be neglected or fit into the original theory.
B. a theory that has a large amount of fine-grained detail that gets lost when you coarse-grain it.
C. a theory where parameters that are finite at one level of coarse-graining become infinite when you got to a finer-grained scale.
D. a theory that does not normalize.
Answer: (A). Theories of type (B) are actually what we love the best, and that fit really well in our paradigm -- recall the Markov chains, that get simpler as you coarse-grain in time. Theories of type (C) are unusual and interesting (when they appear, it's usually when you're doing physics) -- but renormalization actually again works pretty well. Yes, you have some barrier to description at fine-grained scales, but you can go to larger scales without difficulty. In this case, think about (for example) the "slippy counter" Markov Chain -- there we had a theory that we could coarse-grain, but that got really weird when we asked "what does it look like on a finer-grained scale"?
 
