In this video I’ll say a little bit about the general idea behind Rich get richer phenomena and models thereof. So the starting point is observation that the popularity of many things is distributed according to a power law or something that’s power law like has a long tail. For example book sales There are very very many books that sell very very few copies and there are few books that are widely popular. And if you plot a histogram of that you would see a long tail. The story is similar, say for scientific papers how often they get cited. Most scientific papers get cited very rarely, once or twice if at all. And then there’s some very very popular scientific papers, influential scientific papers, that get cited many many many times. Again there’s a long tail perhaps described by a power law. Another example is the popularity of web sites Some web sites have very very many links pointing to them or have very very many hits on the day, whereas other web sites, many many more websites are not popular at all. And have just one or two links to them if any links it at all. So all of these phenomena can be if one looks to data, looks like they might be described by a power law. So the question is why is that. So one answer would be well, because some webpages are better. Some scientific papers are better. Some books are better. Some music, some songs are better and so on. And that’s surely part of the story. But it could also be that there’s a different and alternative dynamics at play. And that’s this rich get richer idea So let me describe in general terms what that might be. So here’s the idea let’s say I am researching a topic maybe power laws and I’m trying to find references about a certain aspect of power laws, so I can learn more about them. So one way I might do that is that I might start with one paper and then look in the references for that paper to see who they cite as I try to learn more about the certain topic so if I do that and then eventually maybe I write a paper and I am going to cite some of the papers that I’ve found and so in that dynamic I’m much more likely to find papers that I’ve already cited many times, If I’m using citations as a way to figure out what papers to find. I could also do I mean that’s not the only way I would find papers But that would be a primary way If I did a search on Google Scholar, It often return hits, higher, rank more highly If those paper have been cited more often. So the idea is maybe originally there is a handful of papers and they’re all equally good but then just by chance one or two of them happened to get cited more often well, then those papers are now have an advantage that little initial advantage can grow and those papers would get cited more often and those papers and then more often still and so on. Another example might be maybe I’m looking for a book to read something for the next airplane flight I have to take I might ask people for recommendations And I’m gonna get recommended books that people have read. So certain book is more likely to get recommended to me the more often it’s been read Therefore I’m more likely to read it then somebody might ask me for recommendation and I would recommend to them the book that I just read. Because other people have recommended it to me. So the idea is that all of these systems there is a little bit of instability. An initial random bump in population can grow very quickly and lead to some superstar books some hits some really popular papers. And in this view those highly cited papers or really popular books or web sites aren’t necessarily the best. Maybe they just got the lucky and then route that advantage to a really large citation count or really high popularity. Now of course both of these things could be in play at the same time Some books are better than others, surely that’s true But also I think it’s true that surely there is some other random effects as well. I’ll return to that later in this section but for now what I want to do is investigate a particular model that leads to one of these rich gets richer dynamics. And it won’t go all the way into the mathematical details Because that’s a bit beyond what we can do but let specify the model and look at a few results so do that the next video and then I’ll step back and talk more broadly about the sorts of phenomena that these types of models can apply to and look at some other applications and implications of them.